Continuous defect detection across a multi-site plant network
We have already bought vision more than once. Each system graded one defect on one line, each came from a different vendor, and none of them talk to each other.
Read the patternBespin builds the full stack beneath your agents, runs it after launch, and holds every agent to the result it was hired to deliver.
Most enterprises have an AI strategy. Far fewer can show what it returned.
A better model ships tomorrow at half the price. When is it in your production?
Fixed at layer 02, Model operations and routing
Who owns each agent you run, and what does each outcome cost?
| Agent | Owner | Cost per outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Claims triage | Unknown | Unknown |
| Invoice match | Unknown | Unknown |
| Support replies | Unknown | Unknown |
| and every agent after that | ||
Fixed at layer 07, outcome management
If either question gave you pause, the gap is in the stack. Find it
Most enterprises built the foundation and jumped straight to agents. The layers they skipped decide whether AI compounds.
Control and outcomes
Business context and agents
Foundation
The people who knew the work chose what to automate and designed the agents themselves.
We manage our agents the way we manage our people: on results.
All 240 worked. None paid for itself, so we retired them.
From a fully private model over 25 million internal records.
Once every agent worked from one shared model of products and regulation.
From an on-premises model that passed a national security certification.
Top-tier on every major cloud.AWS, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure, SOC 2 Type II attested.






Bring one workflow that is slow, expensive, or stuck. Our engineers will walk it through the seven layers with your team and scope the build that closes the gap.
Or ask an assistant about us. This site is written for agents too, starting at /llms.txt.
A detection only matters when it reaches the right person with enough context to act. Orbit Vision AI connects the cameras you already have to Bespin’s own detection models, agent triage, and the systems where work gets assigned.
Often more than once, and none of it reached the maintenance system. Orbit Vision AI is built to be the last vision system a plant buys.
What most plants have
Maintenance systemNothing arrives. The inspection is still manual.
Orbit Vision AI
Maintenance systemA work order, assigned, with the clip attached.
Orbit Vision AI runs models we train on your lines, defect classes, and safety rules, and we own every step between the camera and the fix.
One team and one platform. No handoffs between vendors.
Operations and safety agree the detection accuracy test before anything scales. Each new site is commissioned on its own, not in one cutover.
Runs on Infrastructure at the edge · DataOps · Agent build and operations
Continuous defect detection across a multi-site plant network
We have already bought vision more than once. Each system graded one defect on one line, each came from a different vendor, and none of them talk to each other.
Read the patternForklift and pedestrian proximity safety on an active floor
We have had near misses. Our controls are training, floor tape, and hoping the operator saw the person.
Read the pattern


AI and ML competencies on AWS and Google Cloud, and more than 200 AI projects delivered.
Orbit Vision AI connects computer vision detections to edge deployment, event routing, agent triage, dashboards, and the systems where work gets assigned.
Yes. Orbit Vision AI runs Bespin’s own detection models, trained and tuned on each customer’s lines, defect classes, and safety rules, together with the operational engineering that turns every detection into assigned work.
With one line or one site and a detection accuracy test agreed with operations and safety before anything scales.
Start with one line and an accuracy test your operations and safety teams sign off on.
One view of usage, access, policy, and spend across every model, agent, and cloud, with controls sized to the risks you carry.
There are a dozen AI assistants in use, and we cannot say what data has gone into them.
Every new agent and connector is one more access path, and we have no fast way to assess it.
The framework covers everything. We need the part that fits our risk.
AI spend used to be a line item. Now it touches the whole IT budget.
Usage and spend from every gateway, cloud, and device in one place instead of six consoles.
Every call attributed to an application, team, user, and workload, and it stays attributed as new tools arrive.
Budgets, anomaly alerts, and a router that sends each call to the model policy allows.
Right-sized models, caching, leaner context, and commitments priced against real consumption.
Point the same four steps at an agent and you get outcome management, layer 07 of the stack.
Security and finance arrive from opposite directions and want the same record. Whichever calls first, the other follows.
Security asks
What data went where?
Every new agent, assistant, and connector passes the same four checks inside your existing change process. Frameworks like the NIST AI RMF get cut down to the risks you actually carry.
Finance asks
What did it cost, and what did it buy?
Our method for the cost side of AI. The number you manage moves from monthly spend to cost per resolved case.
SOC 2 Type II attested. Our own controls are independently audited too.
Runs on Governance and security · Outcome management · Tokenomics through every layer
When unmanaged AI spend becomes an audit finding
Internal audit asked which AI tools we use, who is paying for them, and what data goes into them. We could not answer any of the three.
Read the patternAI sprawl across a dozen assistants, and no answer for the CISO
There are at least a dozen AI assistants in use across the business. Our data loss tooling is monitor-only.
Read the patternUsage discovery, agent and connector intake, access and approval controls, audit trails, framework alignment, and cost through Tokenomics, across models, agents, assistants, and clouds.
Tokenomics is the cost method inside AI governance. It reconciles usage to actual billing and measures cost per outcome at every layer of the stack.
Bespin builds the governance layer in your environment and can run it for you under Managed AI.
We start with discovery across every gateway, cloud, and card, reconciled to your invoice.
Generative AI that answers with the source attached, and agents that complete the work inside your systems of record. Every answer has a citation. Every consequential action has an approver.
Every month, a senior person keys values from statements into our system by hand.
What we know is spread across documents, recordings, and spreadsheets, and two systems give two answers.
We pay for a stack of SaaS seats and still run the process in spreadsheets.
Each control leaves a line in the trace.
Before the first request
You own the code from day one. Models sit behind a gateway, so moving to a better one is a configuration change and an evaluation run, not a rebuild.



AI competencies on AWS and Google Cloud, and expert teams on Databricks, Anthropic, Snowflake, and OpenAI.
Runs on DataOps · Ontology · Agent build and operations · Governance
With document pre-processing fully automated end to end.
A round-the-clock voice agent takes orders and writes them into the ERP.
From a generative AI advisor running across ten digital channels.
Documents into the system of record, without anyone keying the values
Every month a senior person pulls statements from a dozen portals and keys the values in by hand. It is the most expensive data entry in the company.
Read the patternReplacing a SaaS stack with an agentic deal desk
Quoting a deal touches five systems and three spreadsheets. Every tool we buy to fix it becomes a sixth place to look.
Read the patternFrom enriched data to a qualified pipeline, with a person on every handoff
We have spent real money enriching our data, and our sellers still start every conversation from scratch.
Read the patternDocument automation into systems of record, cited knowledge search, workflow agents, and bespoke agentic applications, each with evaluation, approvals, and a trace of what it did.
Every extraction and answer carries a citation to its source. Where the evidence is missing, the system leaves a blank and routes the item to a person instead of guessing.
Every agent has an owner and a cost and quality measure per outcome, so weak agents get fixed and agents that no longer justify their cost get retired.
We scope one workflow end to end, with the evaluation set agreed before the build.
Managed AI keeps any AI system operational after launch, whether we built it or you did: monitored, supported, re-evaluated as models change, and held to the outcome it was built for.
AI systems rarely fail the way servers do. They drift, multiply, and get more expensive.
Models change underneath you
A provider updates a model and answers shift. We re-run your evaluations, then promote or roll back.
Data and connectors drift
Sources change shape and permissions move. We watch freshness and fix the sync before users notice.
Agents multiply
New agents arrive every month. Each gets intake, an owner, and a seat in the next portfolio review.
Costs creep
Tokenomics watches spend per agent and per outcome, and alerts on the spike, not the invoice.
We work inside your change, approval, and security processes, so a problem has one owner instead of a chain of vendors.
Set per system, and extended as the system moves closer to customers and revenue.
Runs across every layer of the stack · Tokenomics watches the cost of each
Every review covers each agent’s owner, results, and cost per outcome, and ends in expand, fix, or retire. We run our own agents the same way.
Bespin’s own portfolio, 751 agents designed
Keeping an enterprise AI platform healthy after launch
We launched an AI platform, and adoption outran the team that built it.
Read the patternMonitoring, incident response, model and prompt releases, re-evaluation as models and data change, connector and permission upkeep, cost control through Tokenomics, and regular agent portfolio reviews.
Yes. A system we did not build goes through an intake review first, covering ownership, access, evaluation, and rollback, and then runs on the same terms as the ones we did.
Per system. Most start with business-hours support and extend toward around-the-clock coverage as they move closer to customers and revenue.
We take any AI system through intake and run it on the same terms as our own.
Seven layers, from where a workload runs to whether each agent pays for itself. We use it to find the gap, build only what is missing, and run what we build.
They answer the foundation questions with confidence. Walk all seven with your team, and open any layer to see what we build there.
Control and outcomesBusiness leaders start here
Business context and agentsData and AI teams start here
FoundationCIOs and platform teams start here
Across every layer
The bands are also the build order: design for value at the foundation, engineer for production in the middle, operate and scale at the top. Tokenomics and Managed AI run through all three.
Teams build the foundation and jump straight to agents. The layer underneath every agent and the layer above it decide whether AI compounds.
Layer 04 · Ontology
Without a shared model, each agent invents its own customer, order, and claim, and a year in there are twenty pilots that do not add up to anything.
Without one
customer = policyholdercustomer = account numbercustomer = whoever calledWith one
13%+higher answer accuracy in financial services, once every agent worked from one shared model. Your tenth agent costs less than your first.
Layer 07 · Outcome management
The top layer answers the question a CFO asks: what did this produce, and was it worth it. Agent workforce management treats agents like staff. Scale what earns its keep, fix what falls short, and retire the rest.
Every agent gets
Bespin’s own 751 agents
The engine underneath: AI governance and TokenomicsForward-deployed engineers work inside your repositories, cloud accounts, and systems of record. The people who scope the work build it, which is what gets an AI system through security review.
Walk the seven questions with your team and find the two or three layers where the answers run out.
Cut one business process through the missing layers, with an acceptance test agreed before anyone writes code.
Managed AI keeps it healthy, and the next process reuses the layers already built, so each one costs less than the last.
Every engagement is scoped, staffed, and priced against an outcome you can verify.
Our engineers walk the seven questions with your team and show where the answers run out.
Results from our own operations and from customer systems in production, and the patterns we build most.
Bespin is customer zero. The people who knew the work chose what to automate and designed the agents themselves.
We manage our agents the way we manage our people: on results.
Built by the teams who do the work, not handed down by a central group.
From the agents that stayed in production.
All 240 worked. None paid for itself, so we retired them.
We rebuilt parts of our own deal process as an agentic application, in place of a stack of SaaS subscriptions and spreadsheets. The workflow shapes the software, and agents do the work that used to be a seat in someone else's product.
From a fully private model over 25 million internal records.
Once every agent worked from one shared model of products and regulation.
A round-the-clock voice agent takes orders and writes them into the ERP.
From an on-premises model that passed a national security certification.
With document pre-processing fully automated end to end.
From a generative AI advisor running across ten digital channels.
Partner tier




Competencies








Awards and security



Expert teams on
Documents into the system of record, without anyone keying the values
Every month a senior person pulls statements from a dozen portals and keys the values in by hand. It is the most expensive data entry in the company.
Read the patternReplacing a SaaS stack with an agentic deal desk
Quoting a deal touches five systems and three spreadsheets. Every tool we buy to fix it becomes a sixth place to look.
Read the patternFrom enriched data to a qualified pipeline, with a person on every handoff
We have spent real money enriching our data, and our sellers still start every conversation from scratch.
Read the patternYears of expertise, searchable with the source attached
A decade of what we know is spread across documents, recordings, and spreadsheets, and two systems give two answers to the same question.
Read the patternA multi-agent assistant over nationwide public records
The answers we need sit in public records across every jurisdiction, in a different format in each one.
Read the patternGiving teams the standards their coding agents will actually follow
Our developers are shipping AI-generated code faster than we can review it, and our standards live in a wiki no agent has ever read.
Read the patternWhen unmanaged AI spend becomes an audit finding
Internal audit asked which AI tools we use, who is paying for them, and what data goes into them. We could not answer any of the three.
Read the patternAI sprawl across a dozen assistants, and no answer for the CISO
There are at least a dozen AI assistants in use across the business. Our data loss tooling is monitor-only.
Read the patternKeeping an enterprise AI platform healthy after launch
We launched an AI platform, and adoption outran the team that built it.
Read the patternContinuous defect detection across a multi-site plant network
We have already bought vision more than once. Each system graded one defect on one line, each came from a different vendor, and none of them talk to each other.
Read the patternForklift and pedestrian proximity safety on an active floor
We have had near misses. Our controls are training, floor tape, and hoping the operator saw the person.
Read the patternNo pattern matches both filters yet.
Start with one workflow. We will show where it stalls and scope the build that fixes it.